Delhi HC stays Rs 383-crore fine on Hindustan Unilever for GST profiteering

Delhi HC stays Rs 383-crore fine on Hindustan Unilever for GST profiteering
Photo: Financial Express

The Delhi High Court has stayed an order given by the National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) against Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL).

NAA had imposed a penalty of Rs 383 crore on HUL for not reducing maximum retail prices of its products after the goods and services tax (GST) rate cuts came into effect on November 15, 2017. The court posted the next hearing to April 16.

Earlier, HUL had said NAA had made a narrow interpretation of the law and did not take into account the well-established industry practice backed by law.

Further, alleging that the NAA order is arbitrary, it had said “no methodology has been determined by the NAA as required under law to determine if benefit has been passed or not.”

Various petitions against the orders of the NAA have come up in courts.For instance, real estate firm Pyramid Infratech has moved high court against the order.

The GST rate was cut on a number of products from 28 per cent to 18 per cent. Of the Rs 383 crore, half the sum — Rs 191.5 crore — is to be deposited in the central consumer welfare fund (CWF) and the other half in similar funds of 35 states and union territories (UTs).

HUL has deposited Rs 160 crore in the central CWF, according to calculations made by it. Now, HUL is required to deposit Rs 31.5 crore more into this fund.Of the Rs 191.5 crore for states, Rs 3.62 crore has been apportioned by the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) to CWFs.

HUL was ordered to deposit the balance to the CWFs of states and UTs.

Author’s View :- Prima Facie the order was surprising in the absence of any prescribed method in the GST law to calculate the undue profit earned. “The problem that India Inc faces is how to comply with anti-profiteering rules. That’s because no rule exists,”

CA Ankit Gulgulia (Jain)

CA Ankit Gulgulia (Jain) is Fellow Member of ICAI, Certified IFRS & Business Valuation from ACCA UK and is Practising Chartered Accountant with 8 Years plus of Rich Experience in Audit, GST, Income Tax, DGFT, Valuation, Strategic Advisory, Matters of FEMA, FDI, NCLT, RERA, ROC, SEBI, RBI, M&A, Fundraising, Startups etc as Founder of AGA, Chartered Accountants. AGA Works in wholesome business solutions right from scratch of Company Incorporation to Compliances all under One Roof. He also takes interest in being Virtual Chief Financial Officer (CFO) for Small and Medium Enterprises for Guiding them with All Business, Tax & Strategic Business Decision Making . To Know More, Learn here or contact us at ankitgulgulia@gmail.com

CA Ankit Gulgulia (Jain)
About CA Ankit Gulgulia (Jain) 1116 Articles
CA Ankit Gulgulia (Jain) is Fellow Member of ICAI, Certified IFRS & Business Valuation from ACCA UK and is Practising Chartered Accountant with 8 Years plus of Rich Experience in Audit, GST, Income Tax, DGFT, Valuation, Strategic Advisory, Matters of FEMA, FDI, NCLT, RERA, ROC, SEBI, RBI, M&A, Fundraising, Startups etc as Founder of AGA, Chartered Accountants. AGA Works in wholesome business solutions right from scratch of Company Incorporation to Compliances all under One Roof. He also takes interest in being Virtual Chief Financial Officer (CFO) for Small and Medium Enterprises for Guiding them with All Business, Tax & Strategic Business Decision Making . To Know More, Learn here or contact us at ankitgulgulia@gmail.com

1 Comment

  1. MRP IS INCLUSIVE OF PROFIT AND TAXES. WHEN TAXES COME DOWN, MRP SHOULD ALSO COME DOWN. ITC AT THE HIGHER RATE WAS TAKEN WHEN THE GOODS ARE PURCHASED. MORE CREDIT AND LESS PAYMENT DUE DECREASE IN THE RATE OF GST. THE CASH OUTFLOW FLOW IS REDUCED WHILE PAYING GST. THE ONLY WAY OF EXPLOITATION OF CUSTOMER IS REDUCTION IN MRP. THIS IS COMMON ARTHIMATIC AND COMMON SENSE. THE PRACTICE OF NOT REDUCING MRP IS ONLY PROFITEERING IN THE THE NAME OF GST.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*